|
ENG101 Common Final
Spring, 1998
Genetic testing will / will not
improve the quality of life.
Introduction to the Issue of Genetic Testing
Genetic testing is a rapidly growing field in
the world today. Current genetic tests (screening) can indicate specific
disorders which may be congenital (inherited) or changed or damaged genes
caused by chemical exposure through a person's job. Nevertheless, the most
common reason for utilizing genetic testing is to determine inherited
diseases. These can be done prenatally or postnatally. However, the location
of specific genes which can now indicate the propensity for developing a
disease has created overwhelming joy as well as concern among researchers,
doctors and the general populace.
These advances in genetic testing are also
likely to have profound social and political implications, legal ramifications
and psychological costs. When examining how these test may impact the quality
of life, one must first determine what that means. Does this quality of life
refer to the general well being of a person or just their general health? How
will knowing that one may have a disease (some time in the future) impact
their life style? Will it intimidate their employer or the possibility of
obtaining health coverage? If a parent tests a child, when or should the child
be told the results? How will the knowledge impact the parents in how they
raise and interact with the child? Consequently, with testing comes the need
for genetic counseling.
In response to worldwide concerns, UNESCO
drafted an Universal Declaration of Human Rights as related to the human
genome which will be voted upon at the General Conference in November of this
year. Some of these rights are:
1. "Everyone has a right to respect for their
dignity and for their rights regardless of their genetic characteristics."
2. "Everyone must be able to benefit from advances in biology and genetics,
with due regard to their dignity and rights."
3. "No one may be subjected to discrimination based on genetic characteristics
...."
4. "Genetic data associated with a named person and stored or processed for
the purposes of research or any other purpose must be held confidential and
protected against disclosure to third parties."
TO:
Faculty Participants in the Common Final
The information contained in your
Faculty Packet for the Common Final for Fall, 1997, includes the following:
- Articles that are relevant to
the Common Final Topic
- Instructions for accessing WEB
site addresses
- Selected annotated
bibliography of additional articles
- List of GCC videos available
to supplement classroom activities
- List of materials on reserve
at the GCC Library Circulation Desk
- Suggested classroom activities
and instructions for administering the Common Final
The Student Packets contain
the following:
- The Common Final Topic
- Articles on the topic
- Selected annotated
bibliography of additional articles Instructions for accessing WEB site
- List of GCC videos available
to supplement classroom activities List of materials on reserve at the GCC
Library Circulation Desk
Suggested Classroom Activities for Preparation for
the Common Final
- Assign a group to review
specific article and/or video and then present the information to the entire
class.
- View the videos available from
the GCC Library.
- Ask students to define/discuss
what the quality of life means to them.
- Invite guest speakers to
discuss with students various aspects of genetic testing. If permitted by the
guest speaker, video tape the presentation to share with other classes.
- To initiate dialogue among
students about controversial subjects, present a subject, e.g. mandatory
testing and placement for community college courses. Ask students to go to one
side of the room if they strongly agree or to go to the other side if they
strongly disagree. Ask students to share with the class their reasons for
agreement or disagreement, allowing students to change sides as they hear the
reasons.
- Have an informal debate on the
impact of genetic testing on society.
- Prior to the Common Final
exam, students should be assigned an in-class essay. In other words, the
in-class Common Final exam should be a part of the instructional process, not
a first-time assignment.
Instructions for Administering the Common Final
- Prior to the exam day, faculty
should inform students of the following:
- The common final topic:
Genetic testing will/will not
improve the quality
- Materials that students can
bring to class on the day of the final:
At a minimum students should
be allowed to bring a 3x5 index card on which
they have prepared an outline of the common final essay, their student
packets, and any articles their instructor has used in class or has approved
as resource material for the common final.
- Use of outside resources
to support an argument: Students' essays need to include relevant outside
sources to support the main ideas of their arguments. Their essays
should not be based solely on personal opinion.
- Papers should be in the
following format:
a. Papers that are not laser printed should be written
in blue or black pen.
b. Writing should be double spaced and on only one side
of the paper.
c. Pages of the papers should be numbered.
Note to Faculty: Prior to
submitting your students' papers, please identify papers that
you found difficult to grade by writing a "P" in the
upper right-hand corner of the first page of those essays. Also, remember to
note the numbers of the packets so that you can identify your students' papers
after Assessment Day.
Instructions for Accessing WEB Site For Information
About News Media's Influence on the
Public
1. There are two ways to get to
the
ENG101 Common Final materials on the World Wide Web.
In the location box at
the top of the Netscape window type in this URL:
http://www.gc.maricopa.edu/English/assessment/comfinal.html
OR
2. From GCC's Home Page, locate
the link for the English
department. Click on the word
Assessment in
the left side menu. Under Levels, click on
Departmental. Then, locate the link for
ENG 101
Common Assignment materials in the main text.
WEBSITES
Review of Genetic Testing
http://ww2.med.jhu.edu/tfgtelsi/promoting/prinrec-REVIEW.html
This site gives a
short one and a half page review of Genetic testing by the Task Force on
Genetic Testing.
Review of Genetic Testing
http://ww2.med.jhu.edu/tfgtelsi/promoting/
This site gives
the members of the above Task Force on Genetic Testing.
Search Results from Excite
http://www.excite.com/search.gw?trace=a&search=genetic+testing
This web site
offers additional web sites for specific articles on genetic testing.
MATERIALS IN
THE GCC LIBRARY
These books are on 1 hour reserve at the
Circulation Desk. In order to check these materials out, the student
must have a current student ID card.
Long, Robert Emmet, ed. Rights to
Privacy. New York: H. W.. Wilson, 1997.
(Reference shelf, v.69, no. 3) KF1262 .R54 1997
Taking Sides: Bioethical Issues.
Ref R724 T35 1995 (issue 20); Ref R724 T35 1997 (issue 14)
These are the same, just newer editions
although these articles are not different.
- Nelkin, Dorothy. Dangerous
Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information. New
York: Basic Books, 1989. RA427.5 .N45 1989
- Barker, Penelope, ed. Genetics and
Society. New York: H. W. Wilson, 1995. (Reference Shelf, v.67, no.
3) QH438.7 G44 1995
- Wekesser, Carol, ed. Genetic Engineering.
San Diego: Greenhaven, 1996. QH442 G444 1996.
The following are located at the table behind
the Reference Desk:
- CQ Researcher 1993: 1023. Short
sidebar on DNA Profiling/Medical Screening
- Gene Therapy’s Future. CQ Researcher
8 Dec. 1995: 1103-1104.
- Reproductive Ethics. CQ Researcher 8
Apr. 1994: 295-296.
Videos:
This video conference probes the
possible effects of the "electronic village" and related ethical and social
concerns such as access and privacy.
Quality of Life in the Electronic
Village. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1995. (150
min) TK5105.5 Q38 1995
The section on health and health insurance is
applicable to the topic of genetic testing.
Off Limits: your health, your job, your
privacy. Educational Film Center in association with WETA. PBS, 1994 (57
min) HD6971.8 .O44 1994
A Question of Genes: Inherited
Risks. PBS, 1997. (120 min.)
This tape highlights the
ramifications (positive and negative) of predictive genetic testing through
dialog with patients, doctors and a gene discovery company. Actual cases
are followed over a period of time
NOTE: Library of Congress uses
Medical Screening, not Genetic Testing as a subject heading. In Infotrac,
both subject headings can be used. Also use keyword search |