TABLE OF CONTENTS

Glendale Community College

NCA Self-Study Report, January 2002


Table of Contents | NCA Visit 2002 Home Page | GCC Home Page

Chapter Two

Responses to Interim Advisory Visit

 

Interim Advisory Visit, May 2000

 

In January 2000, a letter from the GCC Faculty Senate informed Interim Chancellor Raúl Cárdenas of ongoing communication difficulties between President Pollack and some faculty.  Upon Dr. Pollack’s recommendation, Dr. Cárdenas requested an NCA Advisory Visit to address these issues.

 

As a result of this request, an NCA Advisory Visit occurred on May 8-9, 2000.  Initial faculty resistance to these dates (spring semester-finals week) was withdrawn because of the necessity to complete the Advisory Visit prior to the end of the semester.  More importantly, the College hoped to resolve real or perceived communication difficulties between the Administration (specifically President Pollack) and faculty and staff.

NCA Advisory Team Members

·      Chair: Dr. Charles J. Carlsen, President, Johnson County Community College, Overland Park, KS 66210

·      Board Member: Ms. Linda Bebout, Business Manager, Columbia Health Care, Riverton, WY 82501

·      Member: Dr. Commodore Craft, Instructor of English, South Suburban College of Cook County, South Holland, IL 60473

·      Member: Dr. B. Diane Davis, Professor of Psychology, Oakton Community College, Des Plaines, IL 60016

Advisory Team Report

The NCA Advisory Visit Report received on July 11, 2000, concluded “GCC has had an excellent reputation for academic excellence.  It is the team’s view that is a very fine institution and although it has serious problems these problems can be solved internally.  To place the institution on probation at this time or take other drastic actions would damage the institution far more than solve the problems.”  The team determined that within the institution rests the good will and shared leadership to identify and work toward common goals.

Findings and Responses

Finding

Board Members should adhere to their Code of Conduct.

 

On December 12, 2000, the Board reaffirmed its Code of Conduct.

Finding

At a Board meeting to be held on campus, Board Members should clarify their expectations of the role of GCC’s President.

 

The Governing Board held a meeting at GCC on September 18, 2000.  The Chancellor clarified his expectations of a president by referencing the job description.  A videotape of this meeting is available in the Resource Room.

Finding

A campus climate survey to identify problem areas should be conducted; collected data should identify problem areas to be mediated by an outside consultant.

 

At the October 13, 2000 President’s Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting, the ad hoc Campus Climate Subcommittee was established.  Dr. Pollack requested several PAC members, along with several other faculty and staff employees, serve on the subcommittee.  Meeting over the spring and summer, with the guidance of Shapard Wolf of the ASU Research Lab, the Subcommittee created a survey instrument to assess the campus climate at the beginning of Fall 2001.  The survey was written during this time and mailed to all full-time, Board-approved employees at the end of September 2001.  Survey results were tabulated and shared with College employees in December 2001.  Dr. Pollack created an ad hoc consultation selection committee, and a consultant was hired in mid-January 2002.

Finding

A Code of Conduct for employees should be developed, including guidelines for dealing with violations of the Code of Ethics (Criterion Five, NCA Handbook).

 

Also at the October 13, 2000 PAC meeting, a second ad hoc committee, Ethics and Campus Code of Conduct Subcommittee, was established.  Dr. Pollack asked PAC members to serve on the subcommittee.  The Subcommittee wrote The Glendale Community College Standards of Conduct and Informal Conflict Resolution Process, and recommended its approval to Dr. Pollack.  PAC adopted the document on September 14, 2001; a copy is available in the Resource Room.

Finding

The President and Faculty Senate leaders should meet regularly to discuss issues of mutual concern.

 

The College President and the Senate President established a standing meeting time to discuss issues of mutual interest and concern.  Administrators also meet with the Senate several times during each semester.  In addition to encouraging faculty to attend regular Senate meetings, Faculty Senate leadership established a monthly Campus Forum/Coffee Hour to foster communication as a continuing priority among faculty.

Next: Chapter Three -- Responses to 1992 Report and Significant Developments


http://www.gc.maricopa.edu/ncaselfstudy/ncaselfstudy/02C2Rs99.htm
Last revised 1/8/02. Direct feedback to l.hawbaker@gcmail.maricopa.edu. See Legal Disclaimer.